PrevPost

NextPost

AUG 4
COMMENTS7
icon
blog

Raw Deal for Raw Milk Seller?

submitted by Equal Exchange

You may have heard that a raw-milk seller called Rawesome in Venice, California, was the target of a police raid yesterday. The story got huge traction when, on the Forbes blog American Times,  E. D. Kaine misread the initial report from Natural News and reported that the raid was "a multi-agency SWAT team hit." But it's important to note that Kaine apparently misread the initial scoop from Natural News who reported it was a "SWAT-style" raid. Big difference there, E.D.

Here's what really happened. From LA Weekly:

[A]gents from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the California Franchise Tax Board, the California Department of Food and Agriculture and all kinds of police descended on the Venice shop Rawesome to make arrests (video via Venice311).

Was it a showy arrest? A violent abuse of power? Not really. Watch the video. Bored cops muttering, "Step back."

Not much to see here, but I think it's important to mention a couple things on behalf of small farmers, co-op groceries, and consumers who rely on raw milk sales in California.

First, this raid was not an "unjustified crackdown on unpasteurized milk."

Why? Because, unlike Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Minnesota, and roughly half the other states in the US, in California, selling raw milk is LEGAL. Furthermore, California's law is exactly the law that states like mine (Minnesota) should adopt. Here, no retail sales are allowed. There, stores can sell raw milk if they have a license to do so. That way, food safety standards can be controlled, product can be traced more easily if something goes wrong, and small dairies can have access to a potentially lucrative niche market.

So keep in mind: The reason the multi-agency raid went down was this: Rawesome was selling raw milk WITHOUT a license. In fact, this is their second set of arrests. Rawesome was raided back on June 10, 2010, for retailing raw food without a license, but continued to break the law.

As for California dairy farmers, there are plenty who produce and sell raw milk legally. But the owner of Healthy Family Farms, who supplied Rawesome with raw milk, has operated "since 2007 without the required licensing for milk production, prosecutors allege." Meanwhile, farms like Claraville and Organic Pastures play by the rules.

And so do grocery co-ops. P6-member Davis Food Co-op in Davis, CA, sells raw milk every single day of the week. Doug Walter of Davis Food Co-op (DFC) assures P6, "Yes, we are engaged in a legal activity. We sell [raw milk] because our customers want it." He mentioned Claraville and Organic Pastures as the two raw cow milk brands that DFC sells, and he points them out to customers frequently, "because they have protocols in their operations to protect the safety of their milk."

So this raid isn't a crackdown on raw foods. Davis Food Co-op, Mollie Stone's and New Leaf Market all must have licenses to sell raw milk in California. And they pay a tax on their sales, too (hence the presence of agents from the California Franchise Tax board at the Rawesome raid).

As for you Minnesotans who can't buy raw milk at P6-member co-op Seward in Minneapolis? Well, you can still buy raw milk cheese anyway -- try the Organic Raw Cheddar from Pastureland, our Hall of Fame inductee this month.

 

Photo courtesy Stefan Kühn (Own work) via Wikimedia Commons


7 comments

  • avatar

    On , Aajonus Vonderplanitz (RightToChoose) said about Raw Deal for Raw Milk Seller?:

    I co-founded Rawesome under my not-for-profit Trust organization Right To Choose Healthy Food (RTCHF). RTCHF/Rawesome members own the animals that produce our food. Rawesome is a private members club only. Clearly understand, MEMBERS own the animals from which they get their dairy products. Only Rawesome members receive product, not for the public.Government regulations require toxic substances be used to produce and maintain products. Members want their milk produced and prepared in ways that are much more healthful than those produced under government regulations. Government should accept our rights to have healthy food.
    • avatar

      On , Barth Anderson (BAnderson) said about Raw Deal for Raw Milk Seller?:

      Thanks for the comments, Ehdra and Sessie. "Is Rawesome a retail store?" That's the question. The consortium of federal, state, and city agencies that raided Rawesome last week say that Rawesome is a retail operation. But from what I have read, you all pay an annual membership fee and then go to the Rawesome "site" (warehouse? what do you call it, if it's not a store?) and purchase food. $7 for a quart of raw goat milk, according to the NYT. That sounds like a grocery co-operative to me, and I said above, food co-ops elsewhere in California have to get a permit if they want to sell raw milk.As for whether or not James Stewart is a "milk processor" or not, that's going to depend on the above definition of "retailer" vs. "membership club." If Stewart (and members) are not retailers, but part-owners of the dairy in Pennsylvania, then Rawesome is effectively a milk processor and culpable for shipping raw milk across state lines. If you're not members, but customers of the club, then Rawesome is a retailer and should have had a permit to sell raw milk.So which would you say it is?
    • avatar

      On , Prairie Girl (PrairieGirl) said about Raw Deal for Raw Milk Seller?:

      If the guy doesn't have a license or is in some way not compliant, that kind of screws it for all other raw milk sellers who are in compliance.People's freedoms become stronger when you show solidarity, not when you stage temper tantrums.
      • avatar

        On , Barth Anderson (BAnderson) said about Raw Deal for Raw Milk Seller?:

        This is Barth Anderson, writer of the article above. So, just to be clear, Ehdra, you're saying you and each member of the Rawesome buying club signed a membership form agreeing to purchase raw milk across state lines, from Pennsylvania into California?
        • avatar

          On , Sessie Luce (Cityflour) said about Raw Deal for Raw Milk Seller?:

          This article is totally inaccurate and misinformed. Please spread the word on that. Rawesome is a private club not open tot he public, and not a "Retailer" in addition it is not involved in "Milk Production" which is regulated. And it also sells many more Raw products than milk that people want the freedom to consume that are not allowed to be sold to the general public. This article is very narrow and the person who wrote it obviously does not know what they are talking about.
          • avatar

            On , EHDRA SEAWARD (DOINGSOMETHING) said about Raw Deal for Raw Milk Seller?:

            Thank you for taking notice but Rawesome was not "selling" milk you misinformed Minnesotan!Having been associated with Rawesome for close to 8 years, I'd really prefer you get your facts straight!We Rawesome members sign a very long and complicated membership agreement and pay a membership fee whereby we become part owners of a farm in Pennsyvania that produces the milk for us.It's OUR milk, dammit, and we don't need no stinkin' government regulators telling us how it should have been processed!.We agree to take the risk of drinking our farm fresh milk just like a bungee jumper signs a waiver before they go plummeting thousands of feet off of a bridge somewhere. Who are government agencies to intervene?? There are huge personal freedom and freedom to contract issues at play here and we certainly hope to insure that EVERYONE'S freedoms only get stronger as we fight this "showy arrest" and yes, "VIOLENT abuse of power".THEY STOLE AND DESTROYED ENOUGH FOOD TO FEED LIKE 1.000 PEOPLE FOR A SOLID WEEK.THEY ARRESTED SOME OF US AND PUT US IN JAIL FOR DAYS ON END WHILE DEMANDING THAT OUR FRIENDS AND FAMILY COME UP WITH UPWARDS OF 60, 000 DOLLARS ETCETERA, ETCETERA, ETCETERA!!THAT my friend ... is violent.Stay tuned for information about this case by going torealfoodrights.com

            Add New Comment

            LINK